
Internet
tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax news
Internet
tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax newsInternet tax moratorium,
e-commerce, simplification,
cross-border buying,
cross-border shopping,
nexus, new and discriminatory
internet tax news
|
Internet
Taxation
Welcome to the
Centers campaign to keep the Internet free from new and discriminatory
taxes. This section will provide you with an in-depth analysis of
the debate over Internet taxation, complete with a detailed background
of the issue, and the Centers activities. We also provide
you with the ability to communicate with your elected officials
in Washington.
INDEX:
Recent Developments From
our Side Center's Activities
Background
Legislation in the 107th Congress In
Their Own Words Contact Congress
Recent
Developments
INDEX
Keep
Internet Tax Issues Separate
By
U.S. Senator George Allen: (Reprinted with permission
from Roll Call)
In the Fall of 2001, the Senate extended by two years a moratorium
on Internet-access taxes monthly fees imposed in addition
to your Internet service provider bill. At the same time, we extended
a moratorium on taxes that discriminate against the Internet as
a form of commerce. However, what should have been an uncontroversial
moratorium was temporarily held hostage because some wanted to chainlink
it to much more controversial and complex issues regarding how to
collect and remit taxes on purchases made on the Internet. To download
the complete story, click
here.
Legislation
Introduced to Extend Internet Tax Moratorium, PERMANENTLY!
On
January 7, the first day of the 108th Congress, Representative Christopher
Cox (R-CA) and Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) introduced companion legislation
(The Internet Tax Nondiscrimination Act) that, if passed, will make
permanent the Internet tax moratorium...[more]
States
Vote to Streamline Collection of Internet Sales Taxes
A coalition of lawmakers and tax collectors from
more than 30 states gathered together in Chicago on November 12
to approve the final draft of an interstate agreement to “simplify”
their tax laws and make it easier for budget-strapped legislators
to collect sales and use taxes on Internet purchases...[more]
States
Clamoring to Tax E-Commerce (Again!)
As state
budgets dwindle, due in part to the nations lingering economic
slump, Governors around the country are once again chomping at the
bit to fill state coffers with tax money collected from e-commerce.
However, they argue its a difficult task; one they hope Congress
might make a little easier -- and more popular -- for them...[more]
President
Bush Signs Extension of Internet Tax Moratorium Into Law
On Wednesday,
President Bush signed into law H.R. 1552, a two year extension of
the Internet tax moratorium passed by the Senate on November 15.
The House approved the measure in October...[more]
Despite
Political Obstructionism, Senate Extends Internet Tax Moratorium
At
last, the principle of lower taxes and less government prevailed
in preserving
the economic engine of tomorrow over revenue-hungry state governors
and Congress "Internet Tax Man."...[more]
Key
Members in Congress Trying to Stop the "Internet Tax Man"
In
an effort to resurrect an extension of the Internet tax moratorium,
blocked by Senator Dorgan (D-ND) just a few days after its expiration
on October 21, several members in Congress are engaged in an intensive
push to obtain Senate approval on a "clean," two-year
extension of the moratorium...[more]
House
Limits Internet Tax Moratorium to Two Years; Senate Allows it to
Expire
With the
Senate failing to act on extending the Internet tax moratorium and
lawmakers not returning to session before its October 21 expiration,
the moratorium on new and discriminatory Internet taxes and the
ban on Internet access taxes will lapse, opening the door to "economic
mischief" by local and state taxing authorities and implanting
further uncertainty in the already crippled technology market...[more]
House
Judiciary Committee Approves Two-Year Extension of Internet Tax
Moratorium
On October
10, the House Judiciary Committee voted 19-15 to extend the Internet
tax moratorium until November 1, 2003, significantly scaling back
the version of H.R. 1552 passed by the Commercial and Administrative
Law Subcommittee in August...[more]
Legislation
Introduced in Senate for Limited Extension of ITFA
With the
Internet tax moratorium set to expire in less than three weeks,
several bills have been introduced in the U.S. Senate calling for
limited extensions to the ban on new and discriminatory taxes on
the Internet and Internet access taxes . . .While these bills do
not specifically include the burdensome sales tax "simplification"
issues that have thus far thwarted progress on adequately extending
or making permanent the moratorium, a limited extension of two years
or less will do nothing to provide much-needed stability to the
Internet and e-commerce. Instead, these bills would hamper the prospects
for future growth in the new economy by implanting further uncertainty
in an already crippled and bludgeoned technology market...[more]
Governor
Gray Davis Signs California Internet Tax Freedom Act
Extends Current Moratorium for Two Years
On September
25, Governor Gray Davis extended the state moratorium on new and
discriminatory taxes on the Internet by signing into law SB 394,
the California Internet Tax Freedom Act (ITFA). The current moratorium
was set to expire in December...[more]
Capitol
Hill Agenda Significantly Altered in Wake of 9-11 Terrorist Attacks
A
House
Judiciary Committee mark-up scheduled for September 13 on H.R. 1552,
the Internet Tax Nondiscrimination Act, has been postponed until
further notice. However, Chairman James Sensenbrenner (R-Wisconsin)
has suggested that he still plans to hold hearings on the issue.
[more]
Owens
Counters Fellow Governors Plea Urges Congress to Extend Internet
Tax Moratorium
In
a move meant to counter his fellow governors plea for Congressional
authority to shift states sales and use tax collection burdens
to remote businesses, Colorado Governor Bill Owens is urging Congress
to extend the three-year Internet tax moratorium set to expire in
October... [more]
Extension
of Internet Tax Moratorium Held Hostage by Nations Governors
It
is unfortunate that our nations governors and their supporters
on Capitol Hill are holding hostage an extension of the Internet
tax moratorium set to expire in October. Apparently, more than 40
governors are sending a letter to Congress urging them not to extend
the ban on new Internet taxes unless states are granted permission
to shift their sales and use tax collection burden to out-of state
merchants... [more]
House
Judiciary Subcommittee Passes Internet Tax Nondiscrimination Act
On
August 2, the House Judiciary Commercial and Administrative Law
Subcommittee passed H.R. 1552, the Internet Tax Nondiscrimination
Act... [more]
House
Energy and Commerce Committee to Consider New Internet Tax Measure
House
Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Billy Tauzin (R-Louisiana)
recently announced the committees intention to consider a
new Internet tax measure in July. The new bill, being drafted by
Representative Cliff Stearns (R-Florida), would exempt digital items
(i.e. music, software and other intangible goods) sold over the
Internet from sales taxes even if Congress allows states
to collect taxes from other online sales... [more]
President
Bush Expresses Support for Extension of Internet Tax Moratorium
The
Bush administration recently expressed its support for extending
the moratorium on Internet taxation. During a press briefing at
the White House, Bush spokesperson Ari Fleischer reiterated the
Presidents campaign pledge to support an extension, and added
that the president favors a permanent ban on all Internet access
taxes.[more]
[BACK
TO TOP]
From our Side INDEX
"Simplification"
Is Not the Easy Answer
The
Internet tax moratorium is set to expire in October, and the debate
over its extension is being clouded by a coalition of states that
fear an eroded tax base, as more consumers shop online. Some of
these states are in the process of enacting model legislation that
includes a "simplified and streamlined" sales tax system with the
hopes of getting congressional approval to force remote merchants
to collect and remit sales taxes on purchases made by their citizens...But
the "simplifications" ...are anything but simple... [more]
Internet
Tax Animation
Produced
by PolicyCounsel.Com:
"The
U.S. Supreme Court has held that it would burden the national economy
to let one state collect tax from a business in another state because
that business sent products into the state." To view the flash
presentation in its entirety, click here.
Virginia
Governor James Gilmore
Testimony before the House Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative
Law
June 26, 2001
". .
. America's response to the Internet revolution should NOT be to
tax it or all the people - the individual taxpayers, consumers and
small businesses - who have been empowered by it. In my view, the
history of the 20th Century was about bigger government built at
the expense of hardworking people. But the 21st Century offers the
promise of smaller, more efficient government and a proportionate
increase in the economic freedom and liberty of individual people
who are permitted to keep more of their own money." To read
the full text of Governor Gilmores testimony, click here.
Representative
Christopher Cox
Testimony before the House Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative
Law
June 26, 2001
"Extending
the moratorium is especially important at a time when so many high-tech
and e-commerce companies are struggling to raise capital and make
ends meet. Failure to renew the moratorium will tell the high-tech
sector of our economy that it is "open season" for special Internet
taxes, and send a message to state and local tax authorities that
new, multiple, and discriminatory
Internet taxes may be levied with impunity." To read the full
text of Representative Coxs testimony, click
here.
Commerce
Clause in Cyberspace
In
a world without borders, the Internet facilitates an explosion of
online retail opportunities, as more commerce is moving onto the
Internet. Despite the borderless nature of the Internet, hundreds
of laws concerning the Internet and e-commerce have been passed
over the last few years. This patchwork of state, national and international
laws and regulations threaten continued growth of e-commerce. Many
of these statutes on their face discriminate against out-of-state
commerce and place a burdensome "chilling effect" on interstate
and international e-commerce. The problems facing e-commerce suggest
the extreme need for a cautious approach to state and national regulation
of commercial Internet activity. [more]
[BACK
TO TOP]
Center's Activities INDEX
In
a letter to Senator George Allen (R-VA), the Center expressed strong
support for his legislation to make permanent the moratorium on
multiple and discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce and taxes
on Internet access. Furthermore, the Center applauds his efforts
to repeal current taxes on Internet access in those states that
were grandfathered when Congress originally passed the Internet
Tax Freedom Act in 1998.
To
read the Center’s letter, click
here.
Center
Urges Immediate Senate Action on House-Passed Two-Year Extension
of the Internet Tax Moratorium
In
a letter to Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D- SD) and Minority
Leader Trent Lott (R-MS), the Center for Individual Freedom urged
immediate Senate passage of H.R. 1552, the House-approved two-year
extension of the Internet tax moratorium. Senate failure to pass
the moratorium before its expiration on October 21, has opened the
door to the type of "economic mischief" by state and local
taxing authorities that Congress sought to prevent when it overwhelmingly
approved the Internet Tax Freedom Act in 1998. Click
here to view the letter.
Center
Runs Ad Labeling Senator Byron Dorgan the Internet Tax Man
With state
and local taxing authorities and tax-hungry governors standing by
to impose new and discriminatory taxes on the Internet and taxes
on Internet access, Congress failed to pass an extension of the
Internet tax moratorium before it expired on October 21. On October
16, the House of Representatives passed a limited two-year extension
of the moratorium, but the Senate failed to follow suit after Senator
Byron Dorgan (D-North Dakota) prevented a vote on the measure. When
taxpayers get their first Internet tax bill and want to know whos
responsible, thank Senator Byron Dorgan, the Internet tax man.
To
view the Centers ad which ran in the October 23 edition of
the Washington Times, click here.
CIF
Launches Advertising Campaign to Extend Internet Tax Moratorium--September
4, 2001
The Center
for Individual Freedom (CIF) today launched a television advertising
campaign urging Congress to extend the Internet tax moratorium and
oppose efforts by states to force out-of-state merchants to collect
sales and use taxes on Internet purchases. To read the full press
release, click here.
To view the commercial, click here.
Center
Applauds Representative Bob Goodlattes Introduction of Internet
Tax Fairness Act of 2001
In
a letter to Representative Bob Goodlatte (R-Virginia), the Center
expressed its strong support for the introduction and swift passage
of the Internet Tax Fairness Act of 2001. Goodlattes legislation
makes permanent the current Internet tax moratorium and establishes
much needed bright-line nexus standards for states imposition
of business activity taxes. Click
here to view letter
Center
Urges Support for S. 664, the New Economy Tax Fairness Act
In
a letter to all members of the Senate Finance Committee, the Center
for Individual Freedom expressed its support for S.664, the New
Economy Tax Fairness Act, or NET FAIR. NET FAIR is a commonsense
solution to a complicated issue, as it simply applies the nexus
standards that currently govern catalogue sales to sales over the
Internet. Such clear and uniform nexus standards will reinforce
the constitutional protections afforded to remote vendors under
the Commerce Clause by precluding states from forcing vendors to
collect sales taxes for a state in which they do not have a physical
presence. Click
here to view letter
Center
Announces Support for Making Internet Tax Moratorium Permanent
In
a letter to Senators George Allen, Conrad Burns, John Warner and
Judd Gregg, the Center for Individual Freedom expressed its ardent
support for S. 777, the Internet Tax Non-Discrimination Act. The
new bill would make permanent the moratorium on Internet taxes adopted
by Congress in 1998. The current moratorium is set to expire in
October. Click
here to view letter
[BACK
TO TOP]
Background INDEX
Internet
Tax Freedom Act
In
1998, Congress passed the Internet Tax Freedom Act, which prohibits
Internet access taxes, multiple taxation of a single transaction
by more than on taxing jurisdiction, and discriminatory taxes that
do not apply to offline purchases. To view a copy of the law, click
here.
Advisory
Commission on Electronic Commerces Report to Congress
The
Advisory Commission on Electronic Commerce, authorized by the Internet
Tax Freedom Act of 1998, was created to study federal, state, local
and international taxation and tariffs on transactions using the
Internet and Internet access. To read the commissions findings
and recommendations to Congress, click here.
Quill
Corp. v. North Dakota
In
1992, the Supreme Court ruled in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota that
states, without permission from Congress, cannot require out-of-state
retailers to collect and remit sales taxes unless the retailer has
a substantial physical presence or "nexus" in the state. To read
the decision, click here.
[BACK
TO TOP]
Legislation
in the 108th Congress INDEX
|
House of Representatives |
|
H.R.
49 |
|
Internet
Tax Nondiscrimination Act
Sponsored by Representative Christopher Cox (R-CA), H.R. 49
would make permanent the Internet tax moratorium originally
passed by Congress in 1998. |
Senate |
|
S.
52 |
|
Internet
Tax Nondiscrimination Act
Sponsored by Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), S. 52 would make permanent
the Internet tax moratorium originally passed by Congress in
1998.
|
|
S.
150 |
|
Internet
Tax Non-discrimination Act of 2003
Sponsored by Senator George Allen (R-VA), S.150 would make permanent
the Internet tax moratorium and repeal current taxes on Internet
access in those states that were grandfathered when Congress
originally passed the Internet Tax Freedom Act in 1998.
|
| |
|
|
Legislation in the 107th Congress
INDEX
|
House of Representatives |
|
H.R.
1675 |
|
Internet
Tax Nondiscrimination Act
H.R. 1665, sponsored by Representative Christopher Cox (R-California),
would permanently extend the moratorium enacted by the Internet
Tax Freedom Act of 1998.
|
|
H.R.
1552 |
|
Internet
Tax Nondiscrimination Act
H.R. 1552, sponsored by Representative Christopher Cox (R-California),
would extend the moratorium enacted by the Internet Tax Freedom
Act of 1998 through 2006.
|
|
H.R.
2526 |
|
Internet
Tax Fairness Act of 2001
H.R. 2526, sponsored by Representative Bob Goodlatte (R-Virginia),
would make permanent the moratorium enacted by the Internet
Tax Freedom Act of 1998, and would establish bright-line nexus
standards for states imposition of business activity taxes.
|
|
H.R.
1410 |
|
Internet Tax Moratorium and Equity Act
H.R. 1410, sponsored by Representative Ernest Istook (R-Oklahoma),
would extend the moratorium enacted by the Internet Tax Freedom
Act of 1998 through 2005, and provides authorization and consent
to the states to enter into a Interstate Sales and Use Tax Compact,
describing a uniform and streamlined sales and use tax system.
Those states joining the compact would be granted authority
to force remote businesses to collect and remit sales taxes.
|
Senate |
|
S.
777 |
|
Internet
Tax Nondiscrimination Act
S. 777, sponsored by Senator George Allen (R-Virginia), would
permanently extend the moratorium enacted by the Internet Tax
Freedom Act of 1998.
|
|
S.
664 |
|
New
Economy Tax Fairness Act (NET FAIR)
S. 664, sponsored by Senator Judd Gregg (R-New Hampshire), reinforces
the 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Quill Corp. v. North
Dakota, by establishing clear and uniform nexus standards which
prohibit states from forcing remote businesses to collect and
remit sales and use taxes.
|
|
S.
288 |
|
Internet
Tax Nondiscrimination Act
S. 288, sponsored by Senator Ron Wyden (D-Oregon), would extend
the moratorium enacted by the Internet Tax Freedom Act of 1998
through 2006, and provide for Congressional approval of states
authority to force remote businesses to collect and remit sales
and uses taxes. Such authority could be granted after a state
meets minimum criteria in simplifying their sales and use taxes,
including establishing a one-rate-per-state system.
|
|
|
|
Defense of Internet Tax Freedom Act
S. 1525, sponsored by Senators George Allen (R-Virginia) and
Barbara Boxer (D- California), would extend the moratorium enacted
by the Internet Tax Freedom Act of 1998 through 2006. |
|
|
|
Internet Tax Moratorium Extension Act
S. 1481, sponsored by Senators Ron Wyden (D-Oregon), John McCain
(R- Arizona) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), would extend the
moratorium enacted by the Internet Tax Freedom Act for 2 years,
and encourage States to simplify their sales and use taxes. |
|
|
|
Internet Tax Moratorium Extension Act
S. 1504, sponsored by Senators Byron Dorgan (D-North Dakota)
and John Breaux (D-Louisiana), would extend the moratorium enacted
by the Internet Tax Freedom Act through June 30, 2002. |
| |
|
|
[BACK TO TOP]
In Their Own Words INDEX
"The debate over
the taxation of the Internet isnt about feeding the already
well-lined coffers of government. Its about the fundamentally
American idea that there should be no taxation without representation.
"While
there is no evidence that Main Street firms have lost business due
to tax differentials, that is beside the point. The answer to these
concerns should not be to raise taxes on the Internet, but to lower
taxes on Main Street businesses."
Colorado
Governor Bill Owens
In a letter to Congress urging the extension of the Internet tax
moratorium, and opposing his fellow governors plea for Congressional
approval to force collection of sales and use taxes from remote
businesses.
August 20, 2001
"I
am in favor of extending the Internet tax moratorium in Washington.
The changes are so rapid in technology, whether its the Internet
or e-commerce, and for governments to try to get in front of that
with a tax policy I think is just not sound policy.
New
York Governor George Pataki
Inside Politics
August 17, 2001
In
the New Economy, whats moving is the Internet, and, unfortunately,
governments 20th Century impulse is to tax it. But governments
20th Century impulses, if not checked by Congress, would stop the
Internet dead in its tracks. The risk is real and, if the Internet
is to achieve its full potential, governments must curb their insatiable
appetites for more tax dollars.
Virginia
Governor James Gilmore
Testimony before the House Subcommittee
on Commercial and Administrative Law
July 26, 2001
I
am deeply concerned that a tax on the Internet will serve to hinder
growth in this important sector at the time when it could least afford
it. The proper role of government in this emerging industry is to
encourage its growth. It would be a grave mistake on our part to start
taxing Internet commerce before it has even had a chance to establish
itself.
Massachusetts
Governor Jane Swift
Opposing Taxation of Internet Commerce
Testimony before U.S. Senate Committee
on Commerce, Science and Transportation
March 14, 2001
Today,
as the end date for the moratorium draws near, and as capitol has
been diverted from firms pursuing Internet development, it is more
critical than ever to renew the Internet tax moratorium, and to assure
all Americans that government will not place special burdens on the
new economy.
U.S.
Rep. Christopher Cox (R-California)
Testimony before the House Subcommittee
on Commercial and Administrative Law
July 26, 2001
We
must continue to ensure that the Internet remains free from restrictive
taxation by making the tax moratorium permanent.
U.S.
Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Virginia)
On the introduction of H.R. 2526,
Internet Tax Fairness Act
July, 17, 2001
In
my view, the Internet has the most profound liberating potential since
Gutenbergs invention of the printing press, which allowed the
mass distribution of ideas, thoughts and information. This legislation
is a step forward to keeping the Internet free of unfair, discriminatory
taxation policies that would impede its future growth as a source
of commerce, education and information.
U.S.
Senator George Allen (R-Virginia)
On the introduction of S. 777,
Internet Tax Nondiscrimination Act
April 26, 2001
The
Internet has produced a new arena of commercial activity, primarily
because it has been free of most taxes and regulations. It should
stay that way.
Las
Vegas Review-Journal
Editorial
August 3, 2001
[BACK
TO TOP]
Contact Congress INDEX
Write your elected officials TODAY! Tell them to say NO to new Internet
taxes.
Click on the links below to contact your elected officials:
President
George W. Bush
House
of Representatives
U.S.
Senate
[BACK
TO TOP]
To
subscribe to our e-mail list for periodic updates on
important litigation and legislation affecting your individual
freedoms, click here.
|